Sci-hub needs to be praised for democratizing access to scientific knowledge by bypassing paywalls, thus enabling researchers from all over the world, regardless of their institution's budget, to access the latest research. It has stood against corporate giants that monetized the ※pseudo status§ 每 engaging researcher (paid by government/private funds) to write manuscripts, sending for peer review (unpaid honorary job) and asking researcher or the reader to pay to access the work (again borne by government/private funds). They act as middle men who processed and ※value added to the product§ (read proof reading and formatting) but the creator and end user being paying for the entire affair. Hence, though illegal, morally Sci-hub has higher grounds.
For many individuals, especially those without institutional access to scientific databases, Sci-Hub can be a valuable resource for accessing scientific literature that would otherwise be inaccessible.
Sci-Hub should run and continue advocating for open access to scientific literature, while also exploring legal and sustainable models to achieve this goal.
If Sci-Hub were to cease functioning one day, as an individual, I will consider turning to other legal open access resources. Many journals offer open access options, and repositories like PubMed Central, arXiv, research gate and others provide free access to a large number of articles including contacting authors directly requesting access to their work.
|