In Reply to Reflexing NT-proBNP for sFlt-1/PlGF Ratios That Fall into the Measurement Uncertainty for Preeclampsia Risk Classification

Post time Yesterday 03:05

journal：Clinical Chemistry

Authors：Carmen Garrido-Giménez; Madalina Nicoleta Nan; Mónica Cruz-Lemini; Elisa Llurba; ; Pablo García-Manau; lvaro Garcia-Osuna; Johana Ullmo; Josefina Mora; Olga Sánchez-García; Maria del Carmen Medina-Mallén; Marta Chóliz; Judit Platero; ; M Vila-Cortés; M J Pelegay; M Ricart; B Muoz-Abellana; X Gabaldó Barrios

Published date：--

DOI：10.1093/clinchem/hvag071

PDF link：https://academic.oup.com/clinche ... 8563416/hvag071.pdf

Article link：https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvag071

Article Source：Oxford University Press (OUP)。

Remark：

Post time Yesterday 03:05

: This post has been completed
Completed attachments will be deleted within 24 hours.

[Oxford] In Reply to Reflexing NT-proBNP for sFlt-1/PlGF Ratios That Fall into the Measurement Uncertainty for Preeclampsia Risk Classification

Best Answer

Same Category

Latest Reply

Announcement

Daily Top Contributors

[Oxford] In Reply to Reflexing NT-proBNP for sFlt-1/PlGF Ratios That Fall into the Measurement Uncertainty for Preeclampsia Risk Classification Copy