Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Plus Anticoagulation versus Anticoagulation Alone for Acute Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Post time 6 day(s) ago

journal：Cardiology in Review

Authors：Abdulrahman Kareem AlTuwayhir; Bader Alshammari; Mohamed Abuelazm; Abdullah S. Mirza; Adeeb Bazuhair

Published date：--

DOI：10.1097/crd.0000000000001486

PDF link：https://www.ovid.com/10.1097/CRD.0000000000001486

Article link：https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000001486

Article Source：Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)。

Remark：

Post time 6 day(s) ago

: This post has been completed
Completed attachments will be deleted within 24 hours.

[Ovid] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Plus Anticoagulation versus Anticoagulation Alone for Acute Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Best Answer

Same Category

Latest Reply

Announcement

Daily Top Contributors

[Ovid] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Plus Anticoagulation versus Anticoagulation Alone for Acute Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Copy

Best Answer

Same Category

Latest Reply

Announcement

Daily Top Contributors

[Ovid] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Plus Anticoagulation versus Anticoagulation Alone for Acute Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.