Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to Invasive Coronary Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve Meta-Analysis

Post time The day before yesterday 23:50

journal：Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging

Authors：Richard A.P. Takx; Bjrn A. Blomberg; Hamza El Aidi; Jesse Habets; Pim A. de Jong; Eike Nagel; Udo Hoffmann; Tim Leiner

Published date：2015-1-

DOI：10.1161/circimaging.114.002666

PDF link：https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/ ... CIMAGING.114.002666

Article link：https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.114.002666

Article Source：Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)。

Remark：

Post time The day before yesterday 23:50

: This post has been completed
Completed attachments will be deleted within 24 hours.

[AHA] Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to Invasive Coronary Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve Meta-Analysis

Best Answer

Same Category

Latest Reply

Announcement

Daily Top Contributors

[AHA] Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to Invasive Coronary Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve Meta-Analysis Copy

Best Answer

Same Category

Latest Reply

Announcement

Daily Top Contributors

[AHA] Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to Invasive Coronary Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve Meta-Analysis