Clinical Outcomes Following Optical Coherence Tomographic Versus Intravascular Ultrasound〨uided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta〢nalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Post time 3 day(s) ago

journal：Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Authors：Sheriff N. Dodoo; Sammudeen Ibrahim; Abdul〧atawu Osman; Nivedha Balaji; Rayan Salih; Vikas Kilaru; Dennis K. Ampadu; Afia S. Dodoo; Ugochukwu Egolum; Olga Toleva; Nima Ghasemzadeh; Ronnie Ramadan; Gregory Giugliano; Glen Henry; Uzoma Ibebuogu; Habib Samady

Published date：2025-2-

DOI：10.1002/ccd.31353

PDF link：https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/ccd.31353

Article link：https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31353

Article Source：Wiley。

Remark：

Post time 3 day(s) ago

: Waiting for confirmation
If the PDF has not been accepted after 72 hours, the system will automatically adopt it.

[Wiley] Clinical Outcomes Following Optical Coherence Tomographic Versus Intravascular Ultrasound〨uided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta〢nalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Same Category

Latest Reply

Announcement

Daily Top Contributors

[Wiley] Clinical Outcomes Following Optical Coherence Tomographic Versus Intravascular Ultrasound〨uided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta〢nalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Copy

Same Category

Latest Reply

Announcement

Daily Top Contributors

[Wiley] Clinical Outcomes Following Optical Coherence Tomographic Versus Intravascular Ultrasound〨uided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta〢nalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials