Urgent: Stop Reward Abuse from Deliberate Wrong File Submissions

chuotdocsach Post time 2025-8-15 09:26:43 | Show all posts |Read mode
The user deliberately submitted an incorrect article file to claim reward points. It*s really frustrating that the system marks the post as ※READ,§ preventing others from offering help, and worse, if no one replies, the system automatically awards the reward to the spammer. Please change this and implement a way to control this behavior!
image.png


Reply

Use magic Donate Report

All Reply3 Show all posts
Jinelle Post time 2025-8-16 00:06:03 | Show all posts
System functionality has been restored. If you were improperly deducted points, please provide feedback for resolution.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Donate Report

chuotdocsach Post time 2025-8-16 01:21:47 | Show all posts
Jinelle replied at 2025-8-16 00:06
System functionality has been restored. If you were improperly deducted points, please provide feedb ...

Thanks for the efforts, but the reward points are not the main issue here. The real problem lies in the way the system marks a post as ※replied§ and triggers an automatic reward. As stated, if someone replies with an incorrect answer (often intentionally, just to gain reward points), the system will still mark the post as no longer ※waiting.§ This means no further help will be received for that post, because it no longer appears to need attention. The automatic reward, without any follow-up verification, is the reason why some users keep repeating this behavior.
Proposed Solutions
Change the ※waiting§ status logic
Keep the post marked as ※waiting§ until the original poster accepts an answer, or until a moderator confirms it is correct.
Delay automatic rewards
Implement a waiting period (e.g., 24每48 hours) before granting rewards, giving time for multiple replies and better quality answers.
Introduce answer verification
Allow the original poster or a peer review process to mark an answer as correct before it is rewarded and the post is closed.
Discourage low-quality answers
If an answer marked as ※replied§ is later found to be wrong, remove the reward and log repeated low-quality contributions for potential penalties.
Highlight posts with conflicting answers
If multiple replies disagree, keep the post visible in the ※waiting§ list until resolved.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Donate Report

Jinelle Post time 2025-8-17 16:01:57 | Show all posts
Thank you for your constructive suggestions. We will further consider the recommendation that 'requests remain in the pending section until assistance is adopted'. The enforcement of a waiting period prior to reward allocation has always been our standard practice.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Donate Report

Reply

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

Return to the list